Total
13090 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-40277 | 3 Canonical, Joplinapp, Linux | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Joplin, Linux Kernel | 2025-05-20 | 7.8 High |
| Joplin version 2.8.8 allows an external attacker to execute arbitrary commands remotely on any client that opens a link in a malicious markdown file, via Joplin. This is possible because the application does not properly validate the schema/protocol of existing links in the markdown file before passing them to the 'shell.openExternal' function. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0973 | 1 Microsoft | 16 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 13 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.8 High |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the Windows Installer when the Windows Installer fails to properly sanitize input leading to an insecure library loading behavior. A locally authenticated attacker could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the input sanitization error to preclude unintended elevation. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0722 | 1 Microsoft | 17 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 14 more | 2025-05-20 | 8.8 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application on a guest operating system that could cause the Hyper-V host operating system to execute arbitrary code. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Hyper-V validates guest operating system user input. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0713 | 1 Microsoft | 16 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 13 more | 2025-05-20 | 6.8 Medium |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application that causes a host machine to crash. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving a number of conditions where Hyper-V would fail to prevent a guest operating system from sending malicious requests. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0711 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 9 more | 2025-05-20 | 6.8 Medium |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application that causes a host machine to crash. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving a number of conditions where Hyper-V would fail to prevent a guest operating system from sending malicious requests. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0710 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 9 more | 2025-05-20 | 6.8 Medium |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application that causes a host machine to crash. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving a number of conditions where Hyper-V would fail to prevent a guest operating system from sending malicious requests. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0709 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 1 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application on a guest operating system that could cause the Hyper-V host operating system to execute arbitrary code. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Hyper-V validates guest operating system user input. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0620 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 10 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application on a guest operating system that could cause the Hyper-V host operating system to execute arbitrary code. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Hyper-V validates guest operating system user input. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41606 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Nomad | 2025-05-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 1.0.2 up to 1.2.12, and 1.3.5 jobs submitted with an artifact stanza using invalid S3 or GCS URLs can be used to crash client agents. Fixed in 1.2.13, 1.3.6, and 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40923 | 1 Lief-project | 1 Lief | 2025-05-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the LIEF::MachO::SegmentCommand::virtual_address function of LIEF v0.12.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (DOS) through a segmentation fault via a crafted MachO file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2529 | 1 Cloudflare | 1 Goflow | 2025-05-20 | 7.5 High |
| sflow decode package does not employ sufficient packet sanitisation which can lead to a denial of service attack. Attackers can craft malformed packets causing the process to consume large amounts of memory resulting in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12014 | 2025-05-20 | N/A | ||
| Path Traversal vulnerability in the eSignaViewer component in eSigna product versions 1.0 to 1.5 on all platforms allow an unauthenticated attacker to access arbitrary files in the document system via manipulation of file paths and object identifiers. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21686 | 2025-05-20 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22233 | 2025-05-19 | 3.1 Low | ||
| CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks. Affected Spring Products and Versions Spring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.6 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.19 * 6.0.0 - 6.0.27 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.42 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected Mitigation Users of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix Version Availability 6.2.x 6.2.7 OSS6.1.x 6.1.20 OSS6.0.x 6.0.28 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 5.3.x 5.3.43 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. Generally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation. For setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields. Credit This issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22235 | 2025-05-16 | 7.3 High | ||
| EndpointRequest.to() creates a matcher for null/** if the actuator endpoint, for which the EndpointRequest has been created, is disabled or not exposed. Your application may be affected by this if all the following conditions are met: * You use Spring Security * EndpointRequest.to() has been used in a Spring Security chain configuration * The endpoint which EndpointRequest references is disabled or not exposed via web * Your application handles requests to /null and this path needs protection You are not affected if any of the following is true: * You don't use Spring Security * You don't use EndpointRequest.to() * The endpoint which EndpointRequest.to() refers to is enabled and is exposed * Your application does not handle requests to /null or this path does not need protection | ||||
| CVE-2025-4740 | 2025-05-16 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in BeamCtrl Airiana up to 11.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file coef. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4742 | 2025-05-16 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in XU-YIJIE grpo-flat up to 9024b43f091e2eb9bac65802b120c0b35f9ba856. Affected is the function main of the file grpo_vanilla.py. The manipulation leads to deserialization. Local access is required to approach this attack. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53827 | 2025-05-16 | 7.5 High | ||
| Ericsson Packet Core Controller (PCC) contains a vulnerability where an attacker sending a large volume of specially crafted messages may cause service degradation | ||||
| CVE-2025-20034 | 2025-05-16 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Improper input validation in the BackupBiosUpdate UEFI firmware SmiVariable driver for the Intel(R) Server D50DNP and M50FCP boards before version R01.02.0003 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20031 | 2025-05-16 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Improper input validation for some Intel(R) Graphics Drivers may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | ||||