Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Enterprise Linux
Subscriptions
Total
15491 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-8632 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Cloud-init, Debian Linux, Leap and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| In cloud-init through 19.4, rand_user_password in cloudinit/config/cc_set_passwords.py has a small default pwlen value, which makes it easier for attackers to guess passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8631 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Cloud-init, Debian Linux, Leap and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| cloud-init through 19.4 relies on Mersenne Twister for a random password, which makes it easier for attackers to predict passwords, because rand_str in cloudinit/util.py calls the random.choice function. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8625 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 3 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credentialconfiguration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. The most likely outcome of a successful exploitation of the vulnerability is a crash of the named process. However, remote code execution, while unproven, is theoretically possible. Affects: BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.27, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.11, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.27-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.11-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition. Also release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch | ||||
| CVE-2020-8624 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| In BIND 9.9.12 -> 9.9.13, 9.10.7 -> 9.10.8, 9.11.3 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.1 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.12-S1 -> 9.9.13-S1, 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker who has been granted privileges to change a specific subset of the zone's content could abuse these unintended additional privileges to update other contents of the zone. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8623 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In BIND 9.10.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.10.5-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker that can reach a vulnerable system with a specially crafted query packet can trigger a crash. To be vulnerable, the system must: * be running BIND that was built with "--enable-native-pkcs11" * be signing one or more zones with an RSA key * be able to receive queries from a possible attacker | ||||
| CVE-2020-8622 | 9 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker on the network path for a TSIG-signed request, or operating the server receiving the TSIG-signed request, could send a truncated response to that request, triggering an assertion failure, causing the server to exit. Alternately, an off-path attacker would have to correctly guess when a TSIG-signed request was sent, along with other characteristics of the packet and message, and spoof a truncated response to trigger an assertion failure, causing the server to exit. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8619 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 Medium |
| In ISC BIND9 versions BIND 9.11.14 -> 9.11.19, BIND 9.14.9 -> 9.14.12, BIND 9.16.0 -> 9.16.3, BIND Supported Preview Edition 9.11.14-S1 -> 9.11.19-S1: Unless a nameserver is providing authoritative service for one or more zones and at least one zone contains an empty non-terminal entry containing an asterisk ("*") character, this defect cannot be encountered. A would-be attacker who is allowed to change zone content could theoretically introduce such a record in order to exploit this condition to cause denial of service, though we consider the use of this vector unlikely because any such attack would require a significant privilege level and be easily traceable. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8617 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8616 | 3 Debian, Isc, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Bind, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.6 High |
| A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use of specially crafted referrals, cause a recursing server to issue a very large number of fetches in an attempt to process the referral. This has at least two potential effects: The performance of the recursing server can potentially be degraded by the additional work required to perform these fetches, and The attacker can exploit this behavior to use the recursing server as a reflector in a reflection attack with a high amplification factor. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8608 | 4 Debian, Libslirp Project, Opensuse and 1 more | 11 Debian Linux, Libslirp, Leap and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.6 Medium |
| In libslirp 4.1.0, as used in QEMU 4.2.0, tcp_subr.c misuses snprintf return values, leading to a buffer overflow in later code. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8597 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Point-to-point Protocol Project and 2 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Point-to-point Protocol and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| eap.c in pppd in ppp 2.4.2 through 2.4.8 has an rhostname buffer overflow in the eap_request and eap_response functions. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8595 | 2 Istio, Redhat | 4 Istio, Enterprise Linux, Openshift Service Mesh and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
| Istio versions 1.2.10 (End of Life) and prior, 1.3 through 1.3.7, and 1.4 through 1.4.3 allows authentication bypass. The Authentication Policy exact-path matching logic can allow unauthorized access to HTTP paths even if they are configured to be only accessed after presenting a valid JWT token. For example, an attacker can add a ? or # character to a URI that would otherwise satisfy an exact-path match. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8492 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Python 2.7 through 2.7.17, 3.5 through 3.5.9, 3.6 through 3.6.10, 3.7 through 3.7.6, and 3.8 through 3.8.1 allows an HTTP server to conduct Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attacks against a client because of urllib.request.AbstractBasicAuthHandler catastrophic backtracking. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8450 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
| An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.10. Due to incorrect buffer management, a remote client can cause a buffer overflow in a Squid instance acting as a reverse proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8449 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.10. Due to incorrect input validation, it can interpret crafted HTTP requests in unexpected ways to access server resources prohibited by earlier security filters. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8286 | 9 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more | 22 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 19 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8285 | 10 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 7 more | 32 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 29 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack overflow issue in FTP wildcard match parsing. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8284 | 10 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 7 more | 31 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 28 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.7 Low |
| A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially make curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed, for example doing port scanning and service banner extractions. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8231 | 6 Debian, Haxx, Oracle and 3 more | 6 Debian Linux, Libcurl, Communications Cloud Native Core Policy and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Due to use of a dangling pointer, libcurl 7.29.0 through 7.71.1 can use the wrong connection when sending data. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8177 | 6 Debian, Fujitsu, Haxx and 3 more | 19 Debian Linux, M10-1, M10-1 Firmware and 16 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| curl 7.20.0 through 7.70.0 is vulnerable to improper restriction of names for files and other resources that can lead too overwriting a local file when the -J flag is used. | ||||