Filtered by vendor Trend Micro
Subscriptions
Total
108 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2001-1150 | 1 Trend Micro | 2 Officescan, Virus Buster | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in cgiWebupdate.exe in Trend Micro OfficeScan Corporate Edition (aka Virus Buster) 3.5.2 through 3.5.4 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0637 | 1 Trend Micro | 1 Interscan Viruswall | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| InterScan VirusWall 3.52 build 1462 allows remote attackers to bypass virus protection via e-mail messages with headers that violate RFC specifications by having (or missing) space characters in unexpected places (aka "space gap"), such as (1) Content-Type :", (2) "Content-Transfer-Encoding :", (3) no space before a boundary declaration, or (4) "boundary= ", which is processed by Outlook Express. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1839 | 1 Trend Micro | 1 Interscan Viruswall For Windows Nt | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Trend Micro InterScan VirusWall for Windows NT 3.52 does not record the sender's IP address in the headers for a mail message when it is passed from VirusWall to the MTA, which allows remote attackers to hide the origin of the message. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0533 | 1 Trend Micro | 15 Client-server-messaging Suite Smb, Client-server Suite Smb, Control Manager and 12 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Trend Micro AntiVirus Library VSAPI before 7.510, as used in multiple Trend Micro products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ARJ file with long header file names that modify pointers within a structure. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1929 | 1 Trend Micro | 1 Serverprotect | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in (1) isaNVWRequest.dll and (2) relay.dll in Trend Micro ServerProtect Management Console 5.58 and earlier, as used in Control Manager 2.5 and 3.0 and Damage Cleanup Server 1.1, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via "wrapped" length values in Chunked transfer requests. NOTE: the original report suggests that the relay.dll issue is related to a problem in which a Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC) static library returns invalid values under heavy load. As such, this might not be a vulnerability in Trend Micro's product. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1930 | 1 Trend Micro | 1 Serverprotect | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the Crystal Report component (rptserver.asp) in Trend Micro ServerProtect Management Console 5.58, as used in Control Manager 2.5 and 3.0 and Damage Cleanup Server 1.1, and possibly earlier versions, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the IMAGE parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3379 | 1 Trend Micro | 2 Officescan, Pc-cillin 2005 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple interpretation error in Trend Micro (1) PC-Cillin 2005 12.0.1244 with the 7.510.1002 engine and (2) OfficeScan 7.0 with the 7.510.1002 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an "MZ" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a "triple headed" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the "magic byte bug." | ||||
| CVE-2006-0642 | 1 Trend Micro | 3 Interscan Messaging Security Suite, Interscan Web Security Suite, Serverprotect | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58, and possibly InterScan Messaging Security Suite and InterScan Web Security Suite, have a default configuration setting of "Do not scan compressed files when Extracted file count exceeds 500 files," which may be too low in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to bypass anti-virus checks by sending compressed archives containing many small files. NOTE: since this is related to a configuration setting that has an operational impact that might vary depending on the environment, and the product is claimed to report a message when the compressed file exceeds specified limits, perhaps this should not be included in CVE. | ||||