Filtered by vendor Samba
Subscriptions
Total
236 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-2114 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The SMB1 protocol implementation in Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the "server signing = mandatory" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB servers by modifying the client-server data stream. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2112 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The bundled LDAP client library in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the "client ldap sasl wrapping" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform LDAP protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2118 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| The MS-SAMR and MS-LSAD protocol implementations in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 mishandle DCERPC connections, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks and impersonate users by modifying the client-server data stream, aka "BADLOCK." | ||||
| CVE-2013-4408 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 3 Enterprise Linux, Storage, Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the dcerpc_read_ncacn_packet_done function in librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c in winbindd in Samba 3.x before 3.6.22, 4.0.x before 4.0.13, and 4.1.x before 4.1.3 allows remote AD domain controllers to execute arbitrary code via an invalid fragment length in a DCE-RPC packet. | ||||
| CVE-2010-2063 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the SMB1 packet chaining implementation in the chain_reply function in process.c in smbd in Samba 3.0.x before 3.3.13 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted field in a packet. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0817 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Memory leak in smbd in Samba 3.6.x before 3.6.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) by making many connection requests. | ||||
| CVE-2011-2522 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shut down daemons, (2) start daemons, (3) add shares, (4) remove shares, (5) add printers, (6) remove printers, (7) add user accounts, or (8) remove user accounts, as demonstrated by certain start, stop, and restart parameters to the status program. | ||||
| CVE-2010-1642 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego function in sesssetup.c in smbd in Samba before 3.4.8 and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 allows remote attackers to trigger an out-of-bounds read, and cause a denial of service (process crash), via a \xff\xff security blob length in a Session Setup AndX request. | ||||
| CVE-2011-2694 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the chg_passwd function in web/swat.c in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.10 allows remote authenticated administrators to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the username parameter to the passwd program (aka the user field to the Change Password page). | ||||
| CVE-2010-1635 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The chain_reply function in process.c in smbd in Samba before 3.4.8 and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and process crash) via a Negotiate Protocol request with a certain 0x0003 field value followed by a Session Setup AndX request with a certain 0x8003 field value. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0454 | 3 Canonical, Ibm, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Storwize, Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The SMB2 implementation in Samba 3.6.x before 3.6.6, as used on the IBM Storwize V7000 Unified 1.3 before 1.3.2.3 and 1.4 before 1.4.0.1 and possibly other products, does not properly enforce CIFS share attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to (1) write to a read-only share; (2) trigger data-integrity problems related to the oplock, locking, coherency, or leases attribute; or (3) have an unspecified impact by leveraging incorrect handling of the browseable or "hide unreadable" parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3069 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the (1) sid_parse and (2) dom_sid_parse functions in Samba before 3.5.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Windows Security ID (SID) on a file share. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0547 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 2 Enterprise Linux, Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| client/mount.cifs.c in mount.cifs in smbfs in Samba 3.4.5 and earlier does not verify that the (1) device name and (2) mountpoint strings are composed of valid characters, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (mtab corruption) via a crafted string. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1863 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Samba 4.x before 4.0.4, when configured as an Active Directory domain controller, uses world-writable permissions on non-default CIFS shares, which allows remote authenticated users to read, modify, create, or delete arbitrary files via standard filesystem operations. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4124 | 5 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Opensuse and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Opensuse and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the read_nttrans_ea_list function in nttrans.c in smbd in Samba 3.x before 3.5.22, 3.6.x before 3.6.17, and 4.x before 4.0.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a malformed packet. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0172 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.1, in certain Active Directory domain-controller configurations, does not properly interpret Access Control Entries that are based on an objectClass, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions on modifying LDAP directory objects by leveraging (1) objectClass access by a user, (2) objectClass access by a group, or (3) write access to an attribute. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4476 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.11 and 4.1.x before 4.1.1, when LDAP or HTTP is provided over SSL, uses world-readable permissions for a private key, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the key file, as demonstrated by access to the local filesystem on an AD domain controller. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0213 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 2 Enterprise Linux, Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.21, 3.6.x before 3.6.12, and 4.x before 4.0.2 allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a (1) FRAME or (2) IFRAME element. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0214 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 2 Enterprise Linux, Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.21, 3.6.x before 3.6.12, and 4.x before 4.0.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users by leveraging knowledge of a password and composing requests that perform SWAT actions. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1182 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 5 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els, Rhel Eus and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The RPC code generator in Samba 3.x before 3.4.16, 3.5.x before 3.5.14, and 3.6.x before 3.6.4 does not implement validation of an array length in a manner consistent with validation of array memory allocation, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RPC call. | ||||