Filtered by vendor Apache
Subscriptions
Total
2769 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3157 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 9 Openoffice, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| By exploiting the way Apache OpenOffice before 4.1.4 renders embedded objects, an attacker could craft a document that allows reading in a file from the user's filesystem. Information could be retrieved by the attacker by, e.g., using hidden sections to store the information, tricking the user into saving the document and convincing the user to send the document back to the attacker. The vulnerability is mitigated by the need for the attacker to know the precise file path in the target system, and the need to trick the user into saving the document and sending it back. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5206 | 1 Apache | 1 Traffic Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the HTTP/2 experimental feature in Apache Traffic Server before 5.3.x before 5.3.2 has unknown impact and attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5168. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9803 | 1 Apache | 1 Solr | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Solr's Kerberos plugin can be configured to use delegation tokens, which allows an application to reuse the authentication of an end-user or another application. There are two issues with this functionality (when using SecurityAwareZkACLProvider type of ACL provider e.g. SaslZkACLProvider). Firstly, access to the security configuration can be leaked to users other than the solr super user. Secondly, malicious users can exploit this leaked configuration for privilege escalation to further expose/modify private data and/or disrupt operations in the Solr cluster. The vulnerability is fixed from Apache Solr 6.6.1 onwards. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3163 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Solr, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When using the Index Replication feature, Apache Solr nodes can pull index files from a master/leader node using an HTTP API which accepts a file name. However, Solr before 5.5.4 and 6.x before 6.4.1 did not validate the file name, hence it was possible to craft a special request involving path traversal, leaving any file readable to the Solr server process exposed. Solr servers protected and restricted by firewall rules and/or authentication would not be at risk since only trusted clients and users would gain direct HTTP access. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5647 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A bug in the handling of the pipelined requests in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18, 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.42, 7.0.0 to 7.0.76, and 6.0.0 to 6.0.52, when send file was used, results in the pipelined request being lost when send file processing of the previous request completed. This could result in responses appearing to be sent for the wrong request. For example, a user agent that sent requests A, B and C could see the correct response for request A, the response for request C for request B and no response for request C. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5656 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF's STSClient before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 uses a flawed way of caching tokens that are associated with delegation tokens, which means that an attacker could craft a token which would return an identifer corresponding to a cached token for another user. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9794 | 1 Apache | 1 Geode | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When a cluster is operating in secure mode, a user with read privileges for specific data regions can use the gfsh command line utility to execute queries. In Apache Geode before 1.2.1, the query results may contain data from another user's concurrently executing gfsh query, potentially revealing data that the user is not authorized to view. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5396 | 1 Apache | 1 Traffic Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5394 | 1 Apache | 1 Sling | 2025-04-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the encoding done by the XSSAPI.encodeForJSString() method is not restrictive enough and for some input patterns allows script tags to pass through unencoded, leading to potential XSS vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12618 | 1 Apache | 1 Portable Runtime Utility | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Portable Runtime Utility (APR-util) 1.6.0 and prior fail to validate the integrity of SDBM database files used by apr_sdbm*() functions, resulting in a possible out of bound read access. A local user with write access to the database can make a program or process using these functions crash, and cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8747 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| An information disclosure issue was discovered in Apache Tomcat 8.5.7 to 8.5.9 and 9.0.0.M11 to 9.0.0.M15 in reverse-proxy configurations. Http11InputBuffer.java allows remote attackers to read data that was intended to be associated with a different request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3156 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The OAuth2 Hawk and JOSE MAC Validation code in Apache CXF prior to 3.0.13 and 3.1.x prior to 3.1.10 is not using a constant time MAC signature comparison algorithm which may be exploited by sophisticated timing attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12612 | 1 Apache | 1 Spark | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Spark 1.6.0 until 2.1.1, the launcher API performs unsafe deserialization of data received by its socket. This makes applications launched programmatically using the launcher API potentially vulnerable to arbitrary code execution by an attacker with access to any user account on the local machine. It does not affect apps run by spark-submit or spark-shell. The attacker would be able to execute code as the user that ran the Spark application. Users are encouraged to update to version 2.2.0 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7688 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 updates user password in insecure manner. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7677 | 1 Apache | 1 Ranger | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In environments that use external location for hive tables, Hive Authorizer in Apache Ranger before 0.7.1 should be checking RWX permission for create table. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7682 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 3.2.0 is vulnerable to parameter manipulation attacks, as a result attacker has access to restricted areas. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7681 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. This allows authenticated users to modify the structure of the existing query and leak the structure of other queries being made by the application in the back-end. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7680 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 has an overly permissive crossdomain.xml file. This allows for flash content to be loaded from untrusted domains. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7673 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 uses not very strong cryptographic storage, captcha is not used in registration and forget password dialogs and auth forms missing brute force protection. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7666 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, XSS attacks, click-jacking, and MIME based attacks. | ||||