Total
8868 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1393 | 2 Omarnas, Wordpress | 2 Add Google Social Profiles To Knowledge Graph Box, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Add Google Social Profiles to Knowledge Graph Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's Knowledge Graph settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1378 | 2 Suifengtec, Wordpress | 2 Wp Posts Re-order, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Posts Re-order plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `cpt_plugin_options()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings including capability, autosort, and adminsort settings, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1390 | 2 Haghs, Wordpress | 2 Redirect Countdown, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Redirect countdown plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `countdown_settings_content()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings including the countdown timeout, redirect URL, and custom text, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3332 | 2 Wordpress, Xhanch Studio | 2 Wordpress, Xhanch – My Advanced Settings | 2026-03-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Xhanch - My Advanced Settings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the `xms_setting()` function on the settings update handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Settings that can be modified include favicon URL, Google Analytics account ID, and various WordPress behavior toggles. The `favicon_url` and `ga_acc_id` values are output on the front-end without escaping, enabling a CSRF to Stored XSS chain. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1392 | 2 Superrishi, Wordpress | 2 Sr Wp Minify Html, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| The SR WP Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sr_minify_html_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3331 | 2 Chuckmo, Wordpress | 2 Lobot Slider Administrator, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Lobot Slider Administrator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fourty_slider_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin slider-page configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1503 | 2 Frankkoenen, Wordpress | 2 Plugin Name: Login Register, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| The login_register plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page and insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the 'login_register_login_post' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14037 | 2 Invelity, Wordpress | 2 Invelity Product Feeds, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 8.1 High |
| The Invelity Product Feeds plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion via path traversal in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to missing validation and sanitization in the 'createManageFeedPage' function. This makes it possible for authenticated administrator-level attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server via specially crafted requests that include path traversal sequences, granted they can trick an admin into clicking a malicious link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4143 | 2 Neo2oo5, Wordpress | 2 Neos Connector For Fakturama, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Neos Connector for Fakturama plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.0.14. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ncff_add_plugin_page() function which handles settings updates. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2723 | 2 Phy9pas, Wordpress | 2 Post Snippits, Wordpress | 2026-03-25 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Post Snippits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page handlers for saving, adding, and deleting snippets. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings and inject malicious scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33372 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2026-03-25 | 5.4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Webmail due to improper validation of CSRF tokens. The application accepts CSRF tokens supplied within the request body instead of requiring them through the expected request header. An attacker can exploit this issue by tricking an authenticated user into submitting a crafted request. This may allow unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32816 | 1 Admidio | 1 Admidio | 2026-03-25 | 5.7 Medium |
| Admidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, the delete, activate, and deactivate modes in modules/groups-roles/groups_roles.php perform destructive state changes on organizational roles but never validate an anti-CSRF token. The client-side UI passes a CSRF token to callUrlHideElement(), which includes it in the POST body, but the server-side handlers ignore $_POST["adm_csrf_token"] entirely for these three modes. An attacker who can discover a role UUID (visible in the public cards view when the module is publicly accessible) can embed a forged POST form on any external page and trick any user with the rol_assign_roles right into deleting or toggling roles for the organization. Role deletion is permanent and cascades to all memberships, event associations, and rights data. If exploited, an attacker can trick any user with delegated role-assignment rights into permanently deleting roles, mass-revoking all associated memberships and access to events, documents, and mailing lists, or silently activating or deactivating entire groups, with target role UUIDs trivially harvested from the unauthenticated public cards view and no undo path short of a database restore. This issue has been fixed in version 5.0.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22323 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 77 Fl Nat 2008, Fl Nat 2208, Fl Nat 2304-2gc-2sfp and 74 more | 2026-03-24 | 7.1 High |
| A CSRF vulnerability in the Link Aggregation configuration interface allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trick authenticated users into sending unauthorized POST requests to the device by luring them to a malicious webpage. This can silently alter the device’s configuration without the victim’s knowledge or consent. Availability impact was set to low because after a successful attack the device will automatically recover without external intervention. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32839 | 2 Edimax, Edimax Technology | 3 Gs-5008pl, Gs-5008pl Firmware, Edimax Gs-5008pl | 2026-03-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| Edimax GS-5008PL firmware version 1.00.54 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by inducing logged-in administrators to visit malicious pages. Attackers can exploit the lack of anti-CSRF tokens and request validation to change passwords, upload firmware, reboot the device, perform factory resets, or modify network configurations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27978 | 1 Vercel | 1 Next.js | 2026-03-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 16.0.1 and prior to version 16.1.7, `origin: null` was treated as a "missing" origin during Server Action CSRF validation. As a result, requests from opaque contexts (such as sandboxed iframes) could bypass origin verification instead of being validated as cross-origin requests. An attacker could induce a victim browser to submit Server Actions from a sandboxed context, potentially executing state-changing actions with victim credentials (CSRF). This is fixed in version 16.1.7 by treating `'null'` as an explicit origin value and enforcing host/origin checks unless `'null'` is explicitly allowlisted in `experimental.serverActions.allowedOrigins`. If upgrading is not immediately possible, add CSRF tokens for sensitive Server Actions, prefer `SameSite=Strict` on sensitive auth cookies, and/or do not allow `'null'` in `serverActions.allowedOrigins` unless intentionally required and additionally protected. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55040 | 1 Murasoftware | 1 Mura Cms | 2026-03-24 | 8.8 High |
| The import form CSRF vulnerability in MuraCMS through 10.1.10 allows attackers to upload and install malicious form definitions through a CSRF attack. The vulnerable cForm.importform function lacks CSRF token validation, enabling malicious websites to forge file upload requests that install attacker-controlled forms when an authenticated administrator visits a crafted webpage. Full exploitation of this vulnerability would require the victim to select a malicious ZIP file containing form definitions, which can be automatically generated by the exploit page and used to create data collection forms that steal sensitive information. Successful exploitation of the import form CSRF vulnerability could result in the installation of malicious data collection forms on the target MuraCMS website that can steal sensitive user information. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious webpage containing the CSRF exploit and selects the attacker-generated ZIP file, their browser uploads and installs form definitions that create legitimate forms that could be designed with malicious content. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55041 | 1 Murasoftware | 1 Mura Cms | 2026-03-24 | 8 High |
| MuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability in the Add To Group functionality for user management (cUsers.cfc addToGroup method) that allows attackers to escalate privileges by adding any user to any group without proper authorization checks. The vulnerable function lacks CSRF token validation and directly processes user-supplied userId and groupId parameters via getUserManager().createUserInGorup(), enabling malicious websites to forge requests that automatically execute when an authenticated administrator visits a crafted page. Adding a user to the Super Admins group (s2 user) is not possible. Successful exploitation results in the attacker gaining privilege escalation both horizontally to other groups and vertically to the admin group. Escalation to the s2 User group is not possible. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55043 | 1 Murasoftware | 1 Mura Cms | 2026-03-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| MuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability in the bundle creation functionality (csettings.cfc createBundle method) that allows unauthenticated attackers to force administrators to create and save site bundles containing sensitive data to publicly accessible directories. This vulnerability enables complete data exfiltration including user accounts, password hashes, form submissions, email lists, plugins, and site content without administrator knowledge. This CSRF vulnerability enables complete data exfiltration from MuraCMS installations without requiring authentication. Attackers can force administrators to unknowingly create site bundles containing sensitive data, which are saved to publicly accessible web directories. The attack executes silently, leaving administrators unaware that confidential information has been compromised and is available for unauthorized download. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55044 | 1 Murasoftware | 1 Mura Cms | 2026-03-24 | 8.8 High |
| The Trash Restore CSRF vulnerability in MuraCMS through 10.1.10 allows attackers to restore deleted content from the trash to unauthorized locations through CSRF. The vulnerable cTrash.restore function lacks CSRF token validation, enabling malicious websites to forge requests that restore content to arbitrary parent locations when an authenticated administrator visits a crafted webpage. Successful exploitation of the Trash Restore CSRF vulnerability results in unauthorized restoration of deleted content to potentially inappropriate or malicious locations within the MuraCMS website structure. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious webpage containing the CSRF exploit, their browser automatically submits a hidden form that restores specified content from the trash to a location determined by the attacker through the parentid parameter. This can lead to restoration of previously deleted malicious content, placement of sensitive documents in public areas, manipulation of website navigation structure, or restoration of outdated content that was intentionally removed for security or compliance reasons. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55045 | 1 Murasoftware | 1 Mura Cms | 2026-03-24 | 7.1 High |
| The update address CSRF vulnerability in MuraCMS through 10.1.10 allows attackers to manipulate user address information through CSRF. The vulnerable cUsers.updateAddress function lacks CSRF token validation, enabling malicious websites to forge requests that add, modify, or delete user addresses when an authenticated administrator visits a crafted webpage. Successful exploitation of the update address CSRF vulnerability results in unauthorized manipulation of user address information within the MuraCMS system, potentially compromising user data integrity and organizational communications. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious webpage containing the CSRF exploit, their browser automatically submits a hidden form that can add malicious addresses with attacker-controlled email addresses and phone numbers, update existing addresses to redirect communications to attacker-controlled locations or deleted legitimate address records to disrupt business operations. This can lead to misdirected sensitive communications, compromise of user privacy through injection of attacker contact information, disruption of legitimate business correspondence, and potential social engineering attacks via the corrupted address data. | ||||