Filtered by vendor Pivotal Software
Subscriptions
Total
145 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-5173 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving emails with password recovery links, aka "Cross Domain Referer Leakage." | ||||
| CVE-2014-0225 | 3 Pivotal Software, Redhat, Vmware | 4 Spring Framework, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When processing user provided XML documents, the Spring Framework 4.0.0 to 4.0.4, 3.0.0 to 3.2.8, and possibly earlier unsupported versions did not disable by default the resolution of URI references in a DTD declaration. This enabled an XXE attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0781 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The UAA OAuth approval pages in Cloud Foundry v208 to v231, Login-server v1.6 to v1.14, UAA v2.0.0 to v2.7.4.1, UAA v3.0.0 to v3.2.0, UAA-Release v2 to v7 and Pivotal Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.20 are vulnerable to an XSS attack by specifying malicious java script content in either the OAuth scopes (SCIM groups) or SCIM group descriptions. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0780 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| It was discovered that cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.5.x versions prior to 1.5.17 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18 do not properly enforce disk quotas in certain cases. An attacker could use an improper disk quota value to bypass enforcement and consume all the disk on DEAs/CELLs causing a potential denial of service for other applications. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3191 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the change_email form in UAA is vulnerable to a CSRF attack. This allows an attacker to trigger an e-mail change for a user logged into a cloud foundry instance via a malicious link on a attacker controlled site. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4960 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry release v247 through v252, UAA stand-alone release v3.9.0 through v3.11.0, and UAA Bosh Release v21 through v26. There is a potential to subject the UAA OAuth clients to a denial of service attack. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5170 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks on PWS and log a user into an arbitrary account by leveraging lack of CSRF checks. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5007 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Spring Framework, Spring Framework, Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4468 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 238; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.4, 3.x before 3.3.0.2, and 3.4.x before 3.4.1; UAA BOSH before 11.2 and 12.x before 12.2; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.29 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.8 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14388 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Grootfs | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cloud Foundry Foundation GrootFS release 0.3.x versions prior to 0.30.0 do not validate DiffIDs, allowing specially crafted images to poison the grootfs volume cache. For example, this could allow an attacker to provide an image layer that GrootFS would consider to be the Ubuntu base layer. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2773 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal PCF Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.60, 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.41, 1.8.x versions prior to 1.8.23, and 1.9.x versions prior to 1.9.1. Incomplete validation logic in JSON Web Token (JWT) libraries can allow unprivileged attackers to impersonate other users in multiple components included in PCF Elastic Runtime, aka an "Unauthenticated JWT signing algorithm in multiple components" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3190 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the UAA logout link is susceptible to an open redirect which allows an attacker to insert malicious web page as a redirect parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5172 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire password reset links. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4959 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal PCF Elastic Runtime 1.8.x versions prior to 1.8.29 and 1.9.x versions prior to 1.9.7. Pivotal Cloud Foundry deployments using the Pivotal Account application are vulnerable to a flaw which allows an authorized user to take over the account of another user, causing account lockout and potential escalation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8028 | 3 Debian, Pivotal Software, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Spring-ldap, Jboss Amq and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Pivotal Spring-LDAP versions 1.3.0 - 2.3.1, when connected to some LDAP servers, when no additional attributes are bound, and when using LDAP BindAuthenticator with org.springframework.ldap.core.support.DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy as the authentication strategy, and setting userSearch, authentication is allowed with an arbitrary password when the username is correct. This occurs because some LDAP vendors require an explicit operation for the LDAP bind to take effect. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5006 | 1 Pivotal Software | 2 Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Cloud Controller in Cloud Foundry before 239 logs user-provided service objects at creation, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive user credential information via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4966 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. RabbitMQ management UI stores signed-in user credentials in a browser's local storage without expiration, making it possible to retrieve them using a chained attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4965 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. Several forms in the RabbitMQ management UI are vulnerable to XSS attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2165 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Loggregator Traffic Controller endpoints in cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.5.19 AND 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.20 are not cleansing request URL paths when they are invalid and are returning them in the 404 response. This could allow malicious scripts to be written directly into the 404 response. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8032 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Cf, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Cloud Foundry cf-release versions prior to v264; UAA release all versions of UAA v2.x.x, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.13, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.15, 3.20.x versions prior to v3.20.0, and other versions prior to v4.4.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.17, 24.x versions prior to v24.12. 30.x versions prior to 30.5, and other versions prior to v41, zone administrators are allowed to escalate their privileges when mapping permissions for an external provider. | ||||