Filtered by vendor Kayako
Subscriptions
Total
26 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2004-1413 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Kayako eSupport 2.x allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) subcat, (2) rate, (3) questiondetails, (4) ticketkey22, (5) email22 parameters to index.php, or (6) the e-mail field of the Forgot Key feature. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0842 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php in Kayako eSupport 2.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) _i or (2) _c parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4637 | 1 Kayako | 1 Supportsuite | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in index.php in Kayako SupportSuite 3.00.26 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) nav parameter in the downloads module, (2) Full Name and (3) Email fields in the core module, (4) Full Name, (5) Email, and (6) Subject fields in the tickets module, or (7) Registered Email field in the lostpassword feature in the core module. | ||||
| CVE-2006-4011 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in esupport/admin/autoclose.php in Kayako eSupport 2.3.1 and earlier, when register_globals is enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the subd parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2004-1412 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php in Kayako eSupport 2.x allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the searchm parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35913 | 1 Kayako | 1 Samourai | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Samourai Wallet Stonewallx2 0.99.98e allows a denial of service via a P2P coinjoin. The attacker and victim must follow each other's paynym. Then, the victim must try to collaborate with the attacker for a Stonewallx2 transaction. Next, the attacker broadcasts a tx, spending the inputs used in Stonewallx2 before the victim can broadcast the collaborative transaction. The attacker does not signal opt in RBF, and uses the lowest fee rate. This would result in the victim being unable to perform Stonewallx2. (Note that the attacker could use multiple paynyms.) | ||||