Filtered by vendor Gnu
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Mailman
Subscriptions
Total
47 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2000-0861 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Mailman 1.1 allows list administrators to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the %(listname) macro expansion. | ||||
| CVE-2001-0290 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in Mailman 2.0.1 and earlier allows list administrators to obtain user passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0855 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 5 Mailman, Enterprise Linux, Linux and 2 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Mailman before 2.0.12 allows remote attackers to execute script as other users via a subscriber's list subscription options in the (1) adminpw or (2) info parameters to the ml-name feature. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0182 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Mailman, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Mailman before 2.0.13 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an email message with an empty subject field. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0038 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in options.py for Mailman 2.1 allows remote attackers to inject script or HTML into web pages via the (1) email or (2) language parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2006-2941 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Mailman, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Mailman before 2.1.9rc1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors involving "standards-breaking RFC 2231 formatted headers". | ||||
| CVE-2025-43921 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-04-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| GNU Mailman 2.1.39, as bundled in cPanel (and WHM), allows unauthenticated attackers to create lists via the /mailman/create endpoint. NOTE: multiple third parties report that they are unable to reproduce this, regardless of whether cPanel or WHM is used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43920 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-04-28 | 5.4 Medium |
| GNU Mailman 2.1.39, as bundled in cPanel (and WHM), in certain external archiver configurations, allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via shell metacharacters in an email Subject line. NOTE: multiple third parties report that they are unable to reproduce this, regardless of whether cPanel or WHM is used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43919 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-04-28 | 5.8 Medium |
| GNU Mailman 2.1.39, as bundled in cPanel (and WHM), allows unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files via ../ directory traversal at /mailman/private/mailman (aka the private archive authentication endpoint) via the username parameter. NOTE: multiple third parties report that they are unable to reproduce this, regardless of whether cPanel or WHM is used. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6893 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Mailman, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user options page in GNU Mailman 2.1.x before 2.1.23 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify an option, as demonstrated by gaining access to the credentials of a victim's account. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7123 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin web interface in GNU Mailman before 2.1.15 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2775 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Gnu and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Mailman and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in GNU Mailman before 2.1.20, when not using a static alias, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in a list name. | ||||
| CVE-2011-0707 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Mailman, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cgi/confirm.py in GNU Mailman 2.1.14 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) full name or (2) username field in a confirmation message. | ||||
| CVE-2011-5024 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in mmsearch/design in the Mailman/htdig integration patch for Mailman allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the config parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3089 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Mailman, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in GNU Mailman before 2.1.14rc1 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) the list information field or (2) the list description field. | ||||
| CVE-2021-34337 | 1 Gnu | 1 Mailman | 2025-02-06 | 6.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Mailman Core before 3.3.5. An attacker with access to the REST API could use timing attacks to determine the value of the configured REST API password and then make arbitrary REST API calls. The REST API is bound to localhost by default, limiting the ability for attackers to exploit this, but can optionally be made to listen on other interfaces. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44227 | 3 Debian, Gnu, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Mailman, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| In GNU Mailman before 2.1.38, a list member or moderator can get a CSRF token and craft an admin request (using that token) to set a new admin password or make other changes. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43332 | 2 Debian, Gnu | 2 Debian Linux, Mailman | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| In GNU Mailman before 2.1.36, the CSRF token for the Cgi/admindb.py admindb page contains an encrypted version of the list admin password. This could potentially be cracked by a moderator via an offline brute-force attack. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43331 | 2 Debian, Gnu | 2 Debian Linux, Mailman | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| In GNU Mailman before 2.1.36, a crafted URL to the Cgi/options.py user options page can execute arbitrary JavaScript for XSS. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42097 | 3 Debian, Gnu, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Mailman, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.0 High |
| GNU Mailman before 2.1.35 may allow remote Privilege Escalation. A csrf_token value is not specific to a single user account. An attacker can obtain a value within the context of an unprivileged user account, and then use that value in a CSRF attack against an admin (e.g., for account takeover). | ||||