Filtered by vendor Djangoproject
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Django
Subscriptions
Total
126 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-56374 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-10-03 | 5.8 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.) | ||||
| CVE-2025-26699 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 1 more | 2025-10-03 | 5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.7, 5.0 before 5.0.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.20. The django.utils.text.wrap() method and wordwrap template filter are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32873 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). | ||||
| CVE-2024-53907 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer and 1 more | 2025-06-24 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. The strip_tags() method and striptags template filter are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53908 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 2 Django, Ansible Automation Platform | 2025-06-09 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. Direct usage of the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup, when an Oracle database is used, is subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as an lhs value. (Applications that use the jsonfield.has_key lookup via __ are unaffected.) | ||||
| CVE-2021-45116 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Fedora, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-05-22 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41323 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Rhui, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-05-14 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7233 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Openstack, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7234 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12794 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Django 1.10.x before 1.10.8 and 1.11.x before 1.11.5, HTML autoescaping was disabled in a portion of the template for the technical 500 debug page. Given the right circumstances, this allowed a cross-site scripting attack. This vulnerability shouldn't affect most production sites since you shouldn't run with "DEBUG = True" (which makes this page accessible) in your production settings. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0480 | 2 Djangoproject, Opensuse | 2 Django, Opensuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The core.urlresolvers.reverse function in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 does not properly validate URLs, which allows remote attackers to conduct phishing attacks via a // (slash slash) in a URL, which triggers a scheme-relative URL to be generated. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0483 | 2 Djangoproject, Opensuse | 2 Django, Opensuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The administrative interface (contrib.admin) in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 does not check if a field represents a relationship between models, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a to_field parameter in a popup action to an admin change form page, as demonstrated by a /admin/auth/user/?pop=1&t=password URI. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3982 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The session.flush function in the cached_db backend in Django 1.8.x before 1.8.2 does not properly flush the session, which allows remote attackers to hijack user sessions via an empty string in the session key. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0481 | 4 Debian, Djangoproject, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Django, Opensuse and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The default configuration for the file upload handling system in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 uses a sequential file name generation process when a file with a conflicting name is uploaded, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by unloading a multiple files with the same name. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2513 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Django, Openstack, Openstack-optools | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The password hasher in contrib/auth/hashers.py in Django before 1.8.10 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 allows remote attackers to enumerate users via a timing attack involving login requests. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8213 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Django, Openstack, Openstack-optools | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The get_format function in utils/formats.py in Django before 1.7.x before 1.7.11, 1.8.x before 1.8.7, and 1.9.x before 1.9rc2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive application secrets via a settings key in place of a date/time format setting, as demonstrated by SECRET_KEY. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0473 | 3 Canonical, Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Django, Openstack | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The caching framework in Django before 1.4.11, 1.5.x before 1.5.6, 1.6.x before 1.6.3, and 1.7.x before 1.7 beta 2 reuses a cached CSRF token for all anonymous users, which allows remote attackers to bypass CSRF protections by reading the CSRF cookie for anonymous users. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3730 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Djangoproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Django and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The django.util.http.is_safe_url function in Django 1.4 before 1.4.13, 1.5 before 1.5.8, 1.6 before 1.6.5, and 1.7 before 1.7b4 does not properly validate URLs, which allows remote attackers to conduct open redirect attacks via a malformed URL, as demonstrated by "http:\\\djangoproject.com." | ||||
| CVE-2014-1418 | 2 Canonical, Djangoproject | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Django | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Django 1.4 before 1.4.13, 1.5 before 1.5.8, 1.6 before 1.6.5, and 1.7 before 1.7b4 does not properly include the (1) Vary: Cookie or (2) Cache-Control header in responses, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or poison the cache via a request from certain browsers. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0472 | 3 Canonical, Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Django, Openstack | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The django.core.urlresolvers.reverse function in Django before 1.4.11, 1.5.x before 1.5.6, 1.6.x before 1.6.3, and 1.7.x before 1.7 beta 2 allows remote attackers to import and execute arbitrary Python modules by leveraging a view that constructs URLs using user input and a "dotted Python path." | ||||