Total
9110 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-11726 | 1 Connectwise | 1 Manage | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| services/system_io/actionprocessor/System.rails in ConnectWise Manage 2017.5 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), as demonstrated by changing an e-mail address setting. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11876 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Project Server, Sharepoint Enterprise Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Project Server and Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 allow an attacker to use cross-site forgery to read content that they are not authorized to read, use the victim's identity to take actions on the web application on behalf of the victim, such as change permissions and delete content, and inject malicious content in the browser of the victim, aka "Microsoft Project Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2017-12593 | 1 Asus | 2 Dsl-n10s Firmware, Dsl-n10s Router | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ASUS DSL-N10S V2.1.16_APAC devices allow CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7556 | 1 Hawt | 1 Hawtio | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Hawtio versions up to and including 1.5.3 are vulnerable to CSRF vulnerability allowing remote attackers to trick the user to visit their website containing a malicious script which can be submitted to hawtio server on behalf of the user. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7491 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Moodle 2.x and 3.x, a CSRF attack is possible that allows attackers to change the "number of courses displayed in the course overview block" configuration setting. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12838 | 1 Nexusphp Project | 1 Nexusphp | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NexusPHP 1.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) send manas via a request to mybonus.php or (2) add administrators via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12853 | 1 Rtsindia | 2 Rwr-3g-100, Rwr-3g-100 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The RealTime RWR-3G-100 Router Firmware Version : Ver1.0.56 is affected by CSRF an attack that forces an end user to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which they're currently authenticated. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1300 | 1 Ibm | 1 Openpages Grc Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM OpenPages GRC Platform 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 125162. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7431 | 2 Netiq, Novell | 2 Imanager, Imanager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Novell iManager 2.7.x before 2.7 SP7 Patch 10 HF1 and NetIQ iManager 3.x before 3.0.3.1 have persistent CSRF in object management. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14048 | 1 Blackcat-cms | 1 Blackcat Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| BlackCat CMS 1.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary PHP code into info.php via a crafted new_modulename parameter to backend/addons/ajax_create.php. NOTE: this can be exploited via CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14267 | 1 Ee | 2 4gee Wifi Mbb, 4gee Wifi Mbb Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| EE 4GEE WiFi MBB (before EE60_00_05.00_31) devices have CSRF, related to goform/AddNewProfile, goform/setWanDisconnect, goform/setSMSAutoRedirectSetting, goform/setReset, and goform/uploadBackupSettings. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14362 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Project And Portfolio Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management Center, version 9.32. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow a Cross-Site Forgery attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14683 | 1 Geminabox Project | 1 Geminabox | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| geminabox (aka Gem in a Box) before 0.13.7 has CSRF, as demonstrated by an unintended gem upload. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15063 | 1 Intelliants | 1 Subrion | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| There are CSRF vulnerabilities in Subrion CMS 4.1.x through 4.1.5, and before 4.2.0, because of a logic error. Although there is functionality to detect CSRF, it is called too late in the ia.core.php code, allowing (for example) an attack against the query parameter to panel/database. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6918 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value[#][*] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6756 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Collaboration Provisioning | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Web UI Application of the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Tool through 12.2 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. The vulnerability is due to a lack of defense against cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by forcing the user's browser to perform any action authorized for that user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc90280. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6659 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Collaboration Assurance | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. More Information: CSCvc91800. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(0) 11.6. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15516 | 1 Netapp | 1 Snapcenter Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| NetApp SnapCenter Server versions 1.1 through 2.x are susceptible to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which could be used to cause an unintended authenticated action in the user interface. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8623 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12 and 1.24.x before 1.24.5 does not perform token comparison in constant time before returning, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8624. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6379 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Some administrative paths in Drupal 8.2.x before 8.2.7 did not include protection for CSRF. This would allow an attacker to disable some blocks on a site. This issue is mitigated by the fact that users would have to know the block ID. | ||||