Filtered by vendor Apache
Subscriptions
Total
2436 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-7672 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| If an application allows enter an URL in a form field and built-in URLValidator is used, it is possible to prepare a special URL which will be used to overload server process when performing validation of the URL. Solution is to upgrade to Apache Struts version 2.5.12. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7665 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache NiFi before 0.7.4 and 1.x before 1.3.0, there are certain user input components in the UI which had been guarding for some forms of XSS issues but were insufficient. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7664 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Uploaded XML documents were not correctly validated in Apache OpenMeetings 3.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7666 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, XSS attacks, click-jacking, and MIME based attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7673 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 uses not very strong cryptographic storage, captcha is not used in registration and forget password dialogs and auth forms missing brute force protection. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7682 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 3.2.0 is vulnerable to parameter manipulation attacks, as a result attacker has access to restricted areas. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7683 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 displays Tomcat version and detailed error stack trace, which is not secure. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6891 | 3 Apache, Debian, Gnu | 3 Bookkeeper, Debian Linux, Libtasn1 | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Two errors in the "asn1_find_node()" function (lib/parser_aux.c) within GnuTLS libtasn1 version 4.10 can be exploited to cause a stacked-based buffer overflow by tricking a user into processing a specially crafted assignments file via the e.g. asn1Coding utility. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0236 | 2 Apache, Illinois | 2 Http Server, Ncsa Httpd | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| ScriptAlias directory in NCSA and Apache httpd allowed attackers to read CGI programs. | ||||
| CVE-2009-1197 | 1 Apache | 1 Juddi | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache jUDDI before 2.0 allows attackers to spoof entries in log files via vectors related to error logging of keys from uddiget.jsp. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5659 | 1 Apache | 1 Traffic Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Traffic Server before 6.2.1 generates a coredump when there is a mismatch between content length and chunked encoding. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5656 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF's STSClient before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 uses a flawed way of caching tokens that are associated with delegation tokens, which means that an attacker could craft a token which would return an identifer corresponding to a cached token for another user. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5662 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Batik, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Batik before 1.9, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses batik can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7661 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf Fediz | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF Fediz ships with a number of container-specific plugins to enable WS-Federation for applications. A CSRF (Cross Style Request Forgery) style vulnerability has been found in the Spring 2, Spring 3, Jetty 8 and Jetty 9 plugins in Apache CXF Fediz prior to 1.4.0, 1.3.2 and 1.2.4. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5653 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5652 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| During a routine security analysis, it was found that one of the ports in Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0 to 2.8.0 sent data in plaintext even when the cluster was configured to use TLS. The port in question was used by the StatestoreSubscriber class which did not use the appropriate secure Thrift transport when TLS was turned on. It was therefore possible for an adversary, with access to the network, to eavesdrop on the packets going to and coming from that port and view the data in plaintext. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5654 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Ambari 2.4.x (before 2.4.3) and Ambari 2.5.0, an authorized user of the Ambari Hive View may be able to gain unauthorized read access to files on the host where the Ambari server executes. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5649 | 1 Apache | 1 Geode | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Geode before 1.1.1, when a cluster has enabled security by setting the security-manager property, allows remote authenticated users with CLUSTER:READ but not DATA:READ permission to access the data browser page in Pulse and consequently execute an OQL query that exposes data stored in the cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5648 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| While investigating bug 60718, it was noticed that some calls to application listeners in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M17, 8.5.0 to 8.5.11, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.41, and 7.0.0 to 7.0.75 did not use the appropriate facade object. When running an untrusted application under a SecurityManager, it was therefore possible for that untrusted application to retain a reference to the request or response object and thereby access and/or modify information associated with another web application. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5651 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, the refactoring of the HTTP connectors introduced a regression in the send file processing. If the send file processing completed quickly, it was possible for the Processor to be added to the processor cache twice. This could result in the same Processor being used for multiple requests which in turn could lead to unexpected errors and/or response mix-up. | ||||