Filtered by vendor F5
Subscriptions
Total
868 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-22372 | 3 Apple, F5, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Windows | 2025-01-29 | 5.9 Medium |
| In the pre connection stage, an improper enforcement of message integrity vulnerability exists in BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and Mac OS. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24461 | 3 Apple, F5, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Windows | 2025-01-29 | 7.4 High |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS and may allow an attacker to impersonate a BIG-IP APM system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24594 | 1 F5 | 20 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall and 17 more | 2025-01-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| When an SSL profile is configured on a Virtual Server, undisclosed traffic can cause an increase in CPU or SSL accelerator resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27378 | 1 F5 | 19 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall and 16 more | 2025-01-29 | 7.5 High |
| Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities exist in undisclosed pages of the BIG-IP Configuration utility which allow an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28406 | 1 F5 | 19 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall and 16 more | 2025-01-29 | 4.3 Medium |
| A directory traversal vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility which may allow an authenticated attacker to read files with .xml extension. Access to restricted information is limited and the attacker does not control what information is obtained. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7634 | 1 F5 | 2 Nginx Agent, Nginx Instance Manager | 2025-01-24 | 4.9 Medium |
| NGINX Agent's "config_dirs" restriction feature allows a highly privileged attacker to gain the ability to write/overwrite files outside of the designated secure directory. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23607 | 1 F5 | 2 F5os-a, F5os-c | 2025-01-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| A directory traversal vulnerability exists in the F5OS QKView utility that allows an authenticated attacker to read files outside the QKView directory. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24966 | 1 F5 | 2 F5os-a, F5os-c | 2025-01-24 | 6.2 Medium |
| When LDAP remote authentication is configured on F5OS, a remote user without an assigned role will be incorrectly authorized. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24775 | 1 F5 | 12 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 9 more | 2025-01-23 | 7.5 High |
| When a virtual server is enabled with VLAN group and SNAT listener is configured, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-23979 | 1 F5 | 12 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 9 more | 2025-01-23 | 7.5 High |
| When SSL Client Certificate LDAP or Certificate Revocation List Distribution Point (CRLDP) authentication profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in CPU resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-23976 | 1 F5 | 12 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 9 more | 2025-01-23 | 6 Medium |
| When running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker assigned the Administrator role may be able to bypass Appliance mode restrictions utilizing iAppsLX templates on a BIG-IP system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-23314 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2025-01-23 | 7.5 High |
| When HTTP/2 is configured on BIG-IP or BIG-IP Next SPK systems, undisclosed responses can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-23603 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2025-01-23 | 3.8 Low |
| An SQL injection vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-23306 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Next Cloud-native Network Functions | 2025-01-23 | 4.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP Next CNF and SPK systems that may allow access to undisclosed sensitive files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-22389 | 1 F5 | 12 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 9 more | 2025-01-23 | 7.2 High |
| When BIG-IP is deployed in high availability (HA) and an iControl REST API token is updated, the change does not sync to the peer device. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-7347 | 2 F5, Redhat | 4 Nginx Open Source, Nginx Plus, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-01-22 | 4.7 Medium |
| NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus have a vulnerability in the ngx_http_mp4_module, which might allow an attacker to over-read NGINX worker memory resulting in its termination, using a specially crafted mp4 file. The issue only affects NGINX if it is built with the ngx_http_mp4_module and the mp4 directive is used in the configuration file. Additionally, the attack is possible only if an attacker can trigger the processing of a specially crafted mp4 file with the ngx_http_mp4_module. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3661 | 10 Apple, Cisco, Citrix and 7 more | 13 Iphone Os, Macos, Anyconnect Vpn Client and 10 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.6 High |
| DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 22 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||