Filtered by vendor Openssl
Subscriptions
Total
265 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2006-2940 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l, 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d, and earlier versions allows attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via parasitic public keys with large (1) "public exponent" or (2) "public modulus" values in X.509 certificates that require extra time to process when using RSA signature verification. | ||||
| CVE-2006-2937 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l and 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and memory consumption) via malformed ASN.1 structures that trigger an improperly handled error condition. | ||||
| CVE-2006-3738 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function in OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l, 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d, and earlier versions has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors involving a long list of ciphers. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5502 | 1 Openssl | 1 Fips Object Module | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The PRNG implementation for the OpenSSL FIPS Object Module 1.1.1 does not perform auto-seeding during the FIPS self-test, which generates random data that is more predictable than expected and makes it easier for attackers to bypass protection mechanisms that rely on the randomness. | ||||
| CVE-2008-0891 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.8f and 0.9.8g, when the TLS server name extensions are enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed Client Hello packet. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0591 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The CMS_verify function in OpenSSL 0.9.8h through 0.9.8j, when CMS is enabled, does not properly handle errors associated with malformed signed attributes, which allows remote attackers to repudiate a signature that originally appeared to be valid but was actually invalid. | ||||
| CVE-2008-1672 | 2 Canonical, Openssl | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Openssl | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.8f and 0.9.8g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a TLS handshake that omits the Server Key Exchange message and uses "particular cipher suites," which triggers a NULL pointer dereference. | ||||
| CVE-2008-1678 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Memory leak in the zlib_stateful_init function in crypto/comp/c_zlib.c in libssl in OpenSSL 0.9.8f through 0.9.8h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via multiple calls, as demonstrated by initial SSL client handshakes to the Apache HTTP Server mod_ssl that specify a compression algorithm. | ||||
| CVE-2009-1387 | 3 Canonical, Openssl, Redhat | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Openssl, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The dtls1_retrieve_buffered_fragment function in ssl/d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.0 Beta 2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via an out-of-sequence DTLS handshake message, related to a "fragment bug." | ||||
| CVE-2009-1390 | 3 Gnu, Mutt, Openssl | 3 Gnutls, Mutt, Openssl | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Mutt 1.5.19, when linked against (1) OpenSSL (mutt_ssl.c) or (2) GnuTLS (mutt_ssl_gnutls.c), allows connections when only one TLS certificate in the chain is accepted instead of verifying the entire chain, which allows remote attackers to spoof trusted servers via a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2009-1377 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The dtls1_buffer_record function in ssl/d1_pkt.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8k and earlier 0.9.8 versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large series of "future epoch" DTLS records that are buffered in a queue, aka "DTLS record buffer limitation bug." | ||||
| CVE-2008-0166 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Openssl | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Openssl | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 High |
| OpenSSL 0.9.8c-1 up to versions before 0.9.8g-9 on Debian-based operating systems uses a random number generator that generates predictable numbers, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force guessing attacks against cryptographic keys. | ||||
| CVE-2009-3555 | 9 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 6 more | 15 Http Server, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 12 more | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0078 | 4 Freebsd, Openbsd, Openssl and 1 more | 6 Freebsd, Openbsd, Openssl and 3 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| ssl3_get_record in s3_pkt.c for OpenSSL before 0.9.7a and 0.9.6 before 0.9.6i does not perform a MAC computation if an incorrect block cipher padding is used, which causes an information leak (timing discrepancy) that may make it easier to launch cryptographic attacks that rely on distinguishing between padding and MAC verification errors, possibly leading to extraction of the original plaintext, aka the "Vaudenay timing attack." | ||||
| CVE-1999-0428 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenSSL and SSLeay allow remote attackers to reuse SSL sessions and bypass access controls. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0545 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Linux | 2025-04-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an SSL client certificate with a certain invalid ASN.1 encoding. | ||||
| CVE-2006-4339 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite and 1 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.7, 0.9.7 before 0.9.7k, and 0.9.8 before 0.9.8c, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, removes PKCS-1 padding before generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents OpenSSL from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS #1. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0079 | 23 4d, Apple, Avaya and 20 more | 67 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 64 more | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 High |
| The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0544 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 does not properly track the number of characters in certain ASN.1 inputs, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an SSL client certificate that causes OpenSSL to read past the end of a buffer when the long form is used. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2969 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite and 1 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The SSL/TLS server implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7h and 0.9.8 before 0.9.8a, when using the SSL_OP_MSIE_SSLV2_RSA_PADDING option, disables a verification step that is required for preventing protocol version rollback attacks, which allows remote attackers to force a client and server to use a weaker protocol than needed via a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||